On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:43:53PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:29:07PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:16:41PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: >> >> > The only reason for us to keep maintaining the nsis installer was the >> >> > activex plugin (spicex), which requires those nsis based installers. >> >> > As the next release of RHEV/oVirt won't use the activex plugin (spicex) >> >> > let's completely remove the nsis installer from our tree and focus on >> >> > only maintain the msi installer. >> >> >> >> Given that oVirt 4.0 is not released yet, might make sense to hold that >> >> for a bit? Maybe some last minute issue will prevent that removal. >> > >> > Does anyone know what the newest version of virt-viewer is that oVirt >> > has been shipping ? It could be valid to say that if they want NSIS >> > they should stick on the v2.0-maint of v3.0-maint branches instead >> > of updating to the virt-viewer 4.0 release . >> >> 2.0 with a bunch of patch on top, considering the client is the same >> one used for RHEVM. > > IMHO, since they've not even upgraded to 3.0 release version, I think > we're fine to drop nsis in the virt-viewer-4.0 version, without waiting > for the next oVirt release. Christophe? I'd go for the patch as well (but you know, the patch is mine) ... > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| > |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| > |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
