On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:29:07PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:16:41PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: >> > The only reason for us to keep maintaining the nsis installer was the >> > activex plugin (spicex), which requires those nsis based installers. >> > As the next release of RHEV/oVirt won't use the activex plugin (spicex) >> > let's completely remove the nsis installer from our tree and focus on >> > only maintain the msi installer. >> >> Given that oVirt 4.0 is not released yet, might make sense to hold that >> for a bit? Maybe some last minute issue will prevent that removal. > > Does anyone know what the newest version of virt-viewer is that oVirt > has been shipping ? It could be valid to say that if they want NSIS > they should stick on the v2.0-maint of v3.0-maint branches instead > of updating to the virt-viewer 4.0 release . 2.0 with a bunch of patch on top, considering the client is the same one used for RHEVM. > > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| > |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| > |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
