----- Original Message ----- > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:32:28PM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > I was not necessarily suggesting that strictly all patches should be sent > > for review, even though I could definitely live with having all patches > > being sent on the ML for now, and it's probably easier as it avoids having > > to wonder whether a patch is trivial or not ;) > > Yep normal libvirt practice is that all patches are submitted to the mailing > list. When invoking git send-email, just edit the patch subject to add in > > "Pushed under trivial rule" (or s/trivial/build-breaker fix/) > > That way people are aware of everything going into the tree, but we don't > delay trivial patches uneccessarily. That makes sense because there is no -commit list (probably it's a good decision for a devel list, or not, depending on volume and focus) _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
