Re: [virt-viewer] "Require spice-gtk 0.22" commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:42:43PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Can we get all pushed patches sent to the mailing list so that we can always
> > have the option of getting code review goodness ? :)
> 
> Didn't we discuss this over and over again, and have a rule that says
> that trivial fixes such as build-sys and doc don't have to go through
> mandatory review? And that you can fix other related things the same
> way without making a fuss?

Reference needed, as I don't remember us ever coming to an agreement on that
unfortunately. I definitely remember disagreeing with pushing build-sys
changes without review.

Also, what I meant in my request is "Can we get all pushed patches sent to
the mailing list, either before pushing for non-trivial patches, or after
pushing with a 'pushed as trivial' note for really trivial patches?", sorry
if I was not more explicit.

I was not necessarily suggesting that strictly all patches should be sent
for review, even though I could definitely live with having all patches
being sent on the ML for now, and it's probably easier as it avoids having
to wonder whether a patch is trivial or not ;)

Christophe

Attachment: pgpIM9BBbj1YQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
virt-tools-list mailing list
virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [KVM Development]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux