On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:42:43PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Can we get all pushed patches sent to the mailing list so that we can always > > have the option of getting code review goodness ? :) > > Didn't we discuss this over and over again, and have a rule that says > that trivial fixes such as build-sys and doc don't have to go through > mandatory review? And that you can fix other related things the same > way without making a fuss? Reference needed, as I don't remember us ever coming to an agreement on that unfortunately. I definitely remember disagreeing with pushing build-sys changes without review. Also, what I meant in my request is "Can we get all pushed patches sent to the mailing list, either before pushing for non-trivial patches, or after pushing with a 'pushed as trivial' note for really trivial patches?", sorry if I was not more explicit. I was not necessarily suggesting that strictly all patches should be sent for review, even though I could definitely live with having all patches being sent on the ML for now, and it's probably easier as it avoids having to wonder whether a patch is trivial or not ;) Christophe
Attachment:
pgpIM9BBbj1YQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list