On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 01:08:10PM -0700, Nathaniel Cook wrote: > Makes sense. In the case that we do want to manage many hosts what manager > would you recommend? We want to use vanilla KVM and manage hundreds of > hosts. We have investigated several of the other tools and most seem to > require that something else be running on the hosts besides just libvirtd > to be able to manage them. And others want you to use their OS instead of > your choice linux with libvirtd installed. If you have any suggestions they > would be much appreciated. Thanks virt-manager is explicitly not targetting the "100s of hosts" management use case. The architecture is uses is inherantly wrong for this kind of scale. It aims for low-end ad-hoc management of perhaps 10, to 20 hosts max. For anything larger you should look at a tool like oVirt / RHEV. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
