On 03/01/2013 03:08 PM, Nathaniel Cook wrote: > Makes sense. In the case that we do want to manage many hosts what manager > would you recommend? We want to use vanilla KVM and manage hundreds of hosts. > We have investigated several of the other tools and most seem to require that > something else be running on the hosts besides just libvirtd to be able to > manage them. And others want you to use their OS instead of your choice linux > with libvirtd installed. If you have any suggestions they would be much > appreciated. Thanks ovirt is the obvious choice, it's popular and built around libvirt and kvm, available in Fedora, etc. But like you say I believe it expects you to have the same OS/base image running on each host, not sure on this point though. But the UI and infrastructure is built explicitly to handle things with 100+ hosts, so it's worth taking another look. - Cole _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
