Re: [PATCH virt-viewer 1/6] win32: there is no CONERR$, only CONOUT$

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH virt-viewer 1/6] win32: there is no CONERR$, only CONOUT$
From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:33:26 +0200
Cc: virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20121022075546.GD2334@teriyaki.redhat.com>

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Looks good, ACK.
> Wouldn't this error have been caught earlier if there was error checking
> in this code?

I don't think so, iirc, I noticed the problem because some CONERR$
files were created.


-- 
Marc-André Lureau

References:
- [PATCH virt-viewer 1/6] win32: there is no CONERR$, only CONOUT$
  - From: Marc-André Lureau
- Re: [PATCH virt-viewer 1/6] win32: there is no CONERR$, only CONOUT$
  - From: Christophe Fergeau

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH virt-viewer] Use a mutex to check if VirtViewer running, v2
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH virt-viewer 6/6] Use a mutex to check if VirtViewer running
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH virt-viewer 1/6] win32: there is no CONERR$, only CONOUT$
Next by thread: [PATCH virt-viewer] Use a mutex to check if VirtViewer running, v2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Virtualization] [KVM Development] [CentOS Virtualization] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux]

Powered by Linux