On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:10:34 +0530 Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Steffen Barszus > > To my understanding the mentioned use case would have - according to > > linux-media project logic of how to handle this - would look like > > > > /dev/dvb/adapter0/frontend0 > > /dev/dvb/adapter0/frontend1 > > /dev/dvb/adapter0/demux0 > > ... > > /dev/dvb/adapter0/ca0 > > /dev/dvb/adapter1/frontend0 > > /dev/dvb/adapter1/frontend1 > > /dev/dvb/adapter1/demux0 > > ... > > /dev/dvb/adapter1/ca0 > > > > so it would be 2 adapter with 4 frontends. If for some reason they > > should be in one adapter how to distinguish between the different > > cases ? Maybe i did not understand properly the issue. > > > The very same driver can have 4 real frontends too. By now the issue > got complicated too far by the logic mentioned above: So, how will you > distinguish between real functional and independant adapters, then > (when having multiple adapters) ? Listen Manu, i'm not proposing anything here - i try only to reflect what i read on linux-media mailinglist. If you have different opinion/suggestion/understanding i would be thankful if you could provide some better input on how vdr needs to handle this. _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
