On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:09:46 +0100 Andreas Brachold <ml08@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, den 10.11.2010, 12:23 +0100 schrieb Frank Schmirler: > > ACK. Unique IDs over the lifetime of an SVDRP connection solve the > > actual problem. Everything beyond get's too complicated. > > Here I would agree with you. > > > Guess a touch /video/.update would result in new IDs for all > > recordings. So one must be aware that if an ID is no longer > > available, the corresponding item has not necessarily been deleted. > > Why ? This is not even necessary ! > Missing recordings should simple remove from list (LSTR) and new > recordings should added at end of list. > Anything else would not work with existing svdrp programs. > > > But right now VDR can use only one connection at same time. > > From my point of view (xxv as svdrp client), I would not block the > connection permanent. And I do not would to reread every time any > recordings. So the problem is not the recording numbering (for what ?) , but the svdrp limitation to one connection. _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
