Op Za, 5 september, 2009 18:11, schreef VDR User: > -- SNIP -- > It sounds like the eHD is the most expensive solution in all areas; > time, money, patching, etc. Whereas, vdpau seems to be at the other > end of the spectrum being the least expensive, easiest, and so on. > Depends on how you look at it. I got mine for almost 1,5 years now and I've been able to see and hear HDTV without problems. Yes, the other plugins for mediaplayback seem to have problems with a vanilla VDR setup. But currently I use ReelVDR anyway and it works like a charm and without the problems I have with a vanilla VDR setup ;) > I've got 3 boxes running vdpau, all with different hardware and my > experience has been the same with each setup.. It was a piece of cake > and took almost no time to get going. Now I guess it's the guy who > had a horrible experience turn to tell his story. ;) > I've been experimenting with VDPAU for a while. And yes, it's the next big thing when it comes to hardware accelerated playback. But since I need to put in an additional NVIDIA based videocard with Purevideo HD capabilities, I rather use my onboard intel for X.org and stick to my eHD until I have the money to get me a Atom based device with an ION chipset :) > Regards, > Derek > Regards, Niels Wagenaar _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
