On 04/05/2009, Nicolas Huillard <nicolas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Matthias Becker a écrit :
> and what about anamorphic material?
> A 16:9 SD broadcast in fact still is 4:3 but is streached by the TV to
> 16:9 to look ok (no egg-heads).
> Wouldn't it be correct also to draw the OSD anamorphic so that is not
> screached by the TV?
>
> Did you get the point? It's somehow difficult to describe this topic for me.
With today's pixel-displays, we'd like to avoid all scaling, stretching,
etc. done by the panel itself. ie. like Rolf said, always output from
the computer at panel resolution, with 1:1 pixel mapping.
Video would be scaled, but not the OSD.
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> 2009/5/4 Rolf Ahrenberg <rahrenbe@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Mon, 4 May 2009, Falk Spitzberg wrote:
>>
>>> The OSD should adopt to the size of the video material. If that is
>>> scaled to some non TV screen size, the OSD is scaled by the same factor.
>> I still disagree. If you scale down your OSD to video resolution (i.e.
>> 544x576) and afterwards scale up the both video and OSD to output
>> resolution (i.e. 1280x720), the OSD really looks crap due to scaling
>> artefacts.
--
NH
_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
_______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
