Matthias Becker a écrit :> and what about anamorphic material?> A 16:9 SD broadcast in fact still is 4:3 but is streached by the TV to> 16:9 to look ok (no egg-heads).> Wouldn't it be correct also to draw the OSD anamorphic so that is not> screached by the TV?> > Did you get the point? It's somehow difficult to describe this topic for me. With today's pixel-displays, we'd like to avoid all scaling, stretching, etc. done by the panel itself. ie. like Rolf said, always output from the computer at panel resolution, with 1:1 pixel mapping.Video would be scaled, but not the OSD. > Regards,> Matthias> > 2009/5/4 Rolf Ahrenberg <rahrenbe@xxxxxxxxx>:>> On Mon, 4 May 2009, Falk Spitzberg wrote:>>>>> The OSD should adopt to the size of the video material. If that is>>> scaled to some non TV screen size, the OSD is scaled by the same factor.>> I still disagree. If you scale down your OSD to video resolution (i.e.>> 544x576) and afterwards scale up the both video and OSD to output>> resolution (i.e. 1280x720), the OSD really looks crap due to scaling>> artefacts. -- NH _______________________________________________vdr mailing listvdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
