Re: sub channel numbering system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/06/08 17:36, VDR User wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
> <Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>  I don't like that dot notation.
>>
>>  You could add a '0' to the old channels and leave out the '.', as in
>>
>>  40    KVOA
>>  41    KVOAD
>>  60    KUAT
>>  61    KUATD1
>>  62    KUATK
>>  63    KUATV
>>  64    KUATC
>>  90    KGUN
>>  91    KGUND
> 
> That's fine as long as you don't actually have channel 60, 61, 62, 63,
> etc..  I don't particularly like the . either, but this method isn't
> any better.

Well, at least it doesn't require an additional symbol.
Besides, channel numbers are just that: numbers - and that's *integers*,
not decimals ;-)

Klaus

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux