Harald Milz wrote: > Wolfgang Rohdewald <wolfgang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>On Mittwoch 20 Juli 2005 00:00, Harald Milz wrote: >> >>>So at the end of the day, there's no way around a proper charset >>>conversion... is there anything I can do to help? > > >>Alexander Riedel announced UTF-8 Patch 0.0.3 on May 12 in this >>list. > > > Mmmm, yes, this patch is against 1.3.24, and applying it to 1.3.27 says, > > seneca:/usr/local/src/vdr/VDR # patch -p0 --dry-run < ../vdr-utf8-0.0.3.patch-0001.bin > patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line > patch: **** Only garbage was found in the patch input. > > It seems nobody cares about this functionality when it was against 1.3.24 > and we're now working on 1.3.28. Will 1.3.28 be UTF-8 capable? Klaus, > please. I understand you get lots of patches solving only minor and local > problems but this is about international use of vdr and IMHO important > enough. Well, UTF-8 is something I, personally, absolutely don't need - and don't want! So any implementation of UTF-8 in VDR will, first and foremost, have to be _completely_ enclosed in #ifdefs, so that a "clean" version of VDR can be compiled ;-) That said, there will be no UTF-8 support in the official version 1.4 of VDR. Maybe later, but it has no big priority for me... Klaus
