Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > Harald Milz wrote: > >It seems nobody cares about this functionality when it was against 1.3.24 > >and we're now working on 1.3.28. Will 1.3.28 be UTF-8 capable? Klaus, > >please. I understand you get lots of patches solving only minor and local > >problems but this is about international use of vdr and IMHO important > >enough. > > Well, UTF-8 is something I, personally, absolutely don't need - and don't > want! > So any implementation of UTF-8 in VDR will, first and foremost, have to be > _completely_ enclosed in #ifdefs, so that a "clean" version of VDR can be > compiled ;-) > > That said, there will be no UTF-8 support in the official version 1.4 of > VDR. > Maybe later, but it has no big priority for me... What's the problem with utf-8? Why do you consider it "unclean"? just curious, Johannes
