Lucian Muresan wrote: > The whole thing stinks. They shouldn't punish the actual bypassing of > copy or content protection systems, but the use of the bypassing, I > mean, if you bypass the protection system of material you payed for only > for watching and NOT giving it away to others not even in a non-profit > way, then what can be illegal in that? The fact is that their protection systems are useless, so the have to use bribing (they call it euphemistically "lobbying") to make illegal even discussing about these issues. It's really sad, but maybe we deserve it. Bye -- - Yo tambi?n quiero una Europa libre de Patentes de Software - - I want a Software Patents Free Europe too! And you? - --------------------------------------------------------------- EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 256 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/attachments/20050711/75c1ab11/signature-0001.pgp
