On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:20:47AM +0100, Gr?goire Favre wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:03:56AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > > yep, that's my next step...to make it do a good quality two-pass transcoding. > > Any reason not to do three-pass ? > Even with your actual version you do three-pass :-) yeah, i noticed that. > > even with the default settings as in the script, the quality is reasonable. > > artifacts are only really noticable in graphics and lettering on signs etc. > > And with respect to size ? about 400-450MB per hour, which is a lot better than ~3GB/hour. that's for the one-pass version. haven't actually tried the two (three :) pass version yet. craig -- craig sanders <cas@xxxxxxxxxx> (part time cyborg)
