On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:03:56AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > yep, that's my next step...to make it do a good quality two-pass transcoding. Any reason not to do three-pass ? Even with your actual version you do three-pass :-) > even with the default settings as in the script, the quality is reasonable. > artifacts are only really noticable in graphics and lettering on signs etc. And with respect to size ? Depending on the source, I can achieve a really good quality for about 10% of the original size (best, or worst case I admit, mostly from my camera, not from VDR). > # i don't use scaling, so don't have useful values for $C and $S > # uncomment and provide good values if you want to scale. I don't think you could really automate the cropping and scalling parts, as for example -vf cropdetect is not perfectly usable (sender's logo, etc...) and then one has to scale to really have a perfect quality, I personaly use a value near 0.2 given by the calcbpp.pl from mplayer. > (does "br=96" in lameopts give reasonable sound quality?) At least for me it's enough... > sed's a useful tool...but a bit "clumsier" to use than perl. i tend to > use sh + sed + awk etc for small, simple scripts and for wrapper scripts > that mostly call other programs to do the work, and perl for anything > more complex. I also use bash/sed/awk most of the time :-) Good enhancement to your script ! -- Gr?goire Favre ___________________________________________________________________ http://magma.epfl.ch/Gregoire.Favre mailto:Gregoire.Favre@xxxxxxxxx
