On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:07 PM J William Piggott <elseifthen@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > It seems like this trend stems from Apple. Jobs was fanatical about > form; but what seems have been lost, is that he was equally fanatical > about function. He required that both be satisfied. I cannot find any > function in cal's year header. Can anyone offer any? I was not thinking triggering such discussion about cal. I don't know if my argument is a good one, reading the code I have found that for some locale the room available is not enough to put the month and the year on a single line. If someone can give me example of one or two locales with this issue to do some test, I will appreciate it. So I think for such locale it is better to have the year only at the top. And this behavior is closed to the physical calendar and classic year calendar as you can see on google image "year calendar" search. So I think we can keep it as it and add an option to change the behavior (--noyear-header as Karel has proposed) What do you think about adding options -A and -B as in ncal ? [-A months] [-B months]
