On 3/31/20 8:41 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:39:51AM -0400, J William Piggott wrote:
I still believe the year header is nonsense. IIRC, when I brought this
up last time nobody replied with any justification for it.
Backward compatibility? I personally have no problem with the year
number in "cal -y" output.
I don't think we can create output which will be esthetic enough
for everyone, but we can introduce --noyear-header if it will make
cal(1) more useful for you.
Why? A user can pipe the output through something like 'sed -e 1d'
instead of changing the code for everyone.
-- Bruce
