On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:39:51AM -0400, J William Piggott wrote:
> I still believe the year header is nonsense. IIRC, when I brought this
> up last time nobody replied with any justification for it.
Backward compatibility? I personally have no problem with the year
number in "cal -y" output.
I don't think we can create output which will be esthetic enough
for everyone, but we can introduce --noyear-header if it will make
cal(1) more useful for you.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
