Re: [V2 0/4] hwclock: remove date(1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 02/28/2017 08:37 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 01:25:37PM -0500, J William Piggott wrote:
>>
>> * The last commit/patch adds hwclock-date.c
> 
> Seems better than the previous attempt.
> 
>>    I added this file in case testers do not have 'bison' installed. It
>>    may, or may not, need to be tracked depending on how it is to be
>>    maintained. The 'c' file probably should be included in the
>>    distributed source archive to avoid the bison dependency.  Karel, I
>>    don't know if you want to create a separate clean and build target
>>    for hwclock-date.c, or how you want to handle this. So, if you don't
>>    mind, I'll leave this detail to you.
> 
> Yes, it's good idea to have .c files in the distribution tarball, but
> I'd like to avoid generated files in the git repository. I'll try to
> play with it (autotools) to generate .y to .c on the fly if missing.
> 
> Do you want to keep the .y file sync with gnulib and minimize number
> of our local changes, or is it so stable area that we don't have to
> care about it? ... because I don't like the coding style and  the
> debug stuff. If the overhead to maintain the file locally will be
> minimal than we can probably clean up it :-)

Stripping the gnulib dependencies are significant enough to make syncing
to with upstream impractical, I think. I fact, I have already excluded the
latest changes because they add more gnulib dependencies.

My impression is that the original parse_datetime() is stable. It seems
like most of the changes now involve parse_datetime2() to expand
capabilities. I was using the new api only for the debug output; I
thought if changes were ever needed in the parser it might be helpful.
Since that may be unlikely, and since you don't like the debugging,
parse_datetime2() along with all of its extensions can be removed.

> 
> I guess it will be possible to move it to lib/parse-datetime.c and use
> it on another places in util-linux (instead of our minimalistic
> parse_datetime()), right?

Sure, I think a name change to avoid confusion with gnulib would be
good. Maybe just parse_date.c?

I will work on these changes Karel.

> 
>     Karel
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux