Re: [PATCH] tests: wait for flock background process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:11:42PM +0100, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 11/02/2016 04:51 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> >> +timeout 1s bash -c "while [ \$(ps --ppid $pid |wc -l) -lt 2 ]; do sleep 0.1 ;done" \
> >
> > is "0.1" portable? :-)
> 
> if one has timeout from coreutils, then it's likely that she also has sleep
> from there.  Thus said, I'd rather worry about portability of using timeout
> rather than the "0.1" (if sleep fails, then nobody will care anyway). ;-)

Good point... I have added check for "timeout".

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux