Re: [PATCH] tests: wait for flock background process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/02/2016 04:51 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
>> +timeout 1s bash -c "while [ \$(ps --ppid $pid |wc -l) -lt 2 ]; do sleep 0.1 ;done" \
>
> is "0.1" portable? :-)

if one has timeout from coreutils, then it's likely that she also has sleep
from there.  Thus said, I'd rather worry about portability of using timeout
rather than the "0.1" (if sleep fails, then nobody will care anyway). ;-)

Have a nice day,
Berny
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux