Re: [PATCH] provide alternatives for err, errx, warn and warnx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31-01-2011 17:58:11 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:12:06PM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 31-01-2011 16:53:49 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> > > >  I'll apply this patch after 2.19 release. We have to check that
> > > >  <err.h> does not conflict with any locally defined err() or warn()
> > > >  function or variable.
> > > 
> > >  ... or move all the fallback solution to other file than c.h, for
> > >  example "ulerr.h", and include this file instead of <err.h>.
> > 
> > Hmmm, what's the difference?  The fallbacks are only defined when err.h
> 
>  c.h is included almost everywhere, but currently <err.h> is included
>  only on places where we need err() or warn() or so.
>  
>  For example fdisk/sfdisk.c includes c.h, but has private warn()
>  implementation.

I'm sorry, I missed that one.  I need to recheck, but I thought I had
compiled the full thing successfully on a Linux host.  I'm very sorry
for the inconvenience if it fails with this patch.


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux