> You can officially maintain hwclock(8) in util-linux-ng. I don't see > a problem to split util-linux-ng to logical subsystems/submodules. > This development model works very successfully for example for > Linux kernel. > But I'd like to keep hwclock(8) in util-linux-ng, at kernel.org, > track all development by GIT, discuss relevant topics at > util-linux-ng mailing list and work closely with Linux kernel > developers and downstream maintainers. This is what I'm doing in last > two years and I don't want to work against this development model. There's probably something there I can work with. I would be interested in contributing to util-linux-ng hwclock in a role similar to a kernel subsystem maintainer. But there's a lot to consider. I have a bunch of issues I want to work through in my head and I'll get back to you by the end of the week. -- Bryan Henderson San Jose, California -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html