On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 03:13:52AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > From: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I was puzzled why "hwclock" wrongly reported my x86_64 sytem didn't I had the same question 3 days ago: http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/browse_thread/thread/d25fe9c7c4ee9835 :-) > support RTC update interrupts. Bogus #ifdef, that's why ... added > by the 2.11y patch (from 2.11t). Probably this whole #ifdef should > just vanish ... if the kernel rejects UIE_ON, the program ought to > just cope with it. I think so. The #ifdef seems like a workaround for some old problems with this ioctl. Unfortunately, I cannot found any relevant information about it. Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
