From: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I was puzzled why "hwclock" wrongly reported my x86_64 sytem didn't
support RTC update interrupts. Bogus #ifdef, that's why ... added
by the 2.11y patch (from 2.11t). Probably this whole #ifdef should
just vanish ... if the kernel rejects UIE_ON, the program ought to
just cope with it.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--- a/hwclock/rtc.c
+++ b/hwclock/rtc.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ int ret;
} else {
int rc; /* Return code from ioctl */
/* Turn on update interrupts (one per second) */
-#if defined(__alpha__) || defined(__sparc__) || defined(__x86_64__)
+#if defined(__alpha__) || defined(__sparc__)
/* Not all alpha kernels reject RTC_UIE_ON, but probably they should. */
rc = -1;
errno = EINVAL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
