On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 05:17:29PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 03 September 2007, Karel Zak wrote: > > > I agree that we need a better support for compilation without > > locales, but from my point of view NLS != all locales stuff. The NLS > > support is subset only. > > generally, yes ... i18n and l10n are different/sep topics, but is there any > real need to differentiate them in util-linux ? i'm not terribly familiar ctype.h and widechar stuff depend on LC_CTYPE > with some of the tools, but are there any that really care about things like > wide character inputs and such ? or is it all for localization ? Yes, for example things in text-utils/ have care about wide character inputs. > > BTW, is there any real life example for this change? > > sure, build it under uClibc or any other libc where you can sanely disable all > i18n/l10n cruft OK. Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html