Re: nls/locale handling in util-linux general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 05:17:29PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 03 September 2007, Karel Zak wrote:
 >
> >  I agree that we need a better support for compilation without
> >  locales, but from my point of view NLS != all locales stuff. The NLS
> >  support is subset only.
> 
> generally, yes ... i18n and l10n are different/sep topics, but is there any 
> real need to differentiate them in util-linux ?  i'm not terribly familiar 

 ctype.h and widechar stuff depend on LC_CTYPE

> with some of the tools, but are there any that really care about things like 
> wide character inputs and such ?  or is it all for localization ?

 Yes, for example things in text-utils/ have care about wide character inputs.

> >  BTW, is there any real life example for this change?
> 
> sure, build it under uClibc or any other libc where you can sanely disable all 
> i18n/l10n cruft

 OK.

    Karel


-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux