Re: [PATCH 1/2] of: base: parse all available memory nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:31:26AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 3/23/20 11:21 AM, Clément Leger wrote:
> >> AFAIK the device_type = "memory" property was mandatory in the early
> >> days as well, there shouldn't be any /memory nodes without this
> >> property. Given that, is the add-legacy-node-first still necessary?
> > 
> > Agreed, I did that after speaking with someone on IRC which stated
> > (rightfully), that I should keep the legacy behavior if possible.
> 
> My concern was about HW that passes a device tree to barebox (PowerPC
> possibly?), where it might have worked before and now won't anymore.
> 
> If this is no real concern, it can be removed.

There is no PowerPC hardware supported by barebox that passes a device
tree to barebox. I don't think this is necessary.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux