Hi, On 3/23/20 11:21 AM, Clément Leger wrote: >> AFAIK the device_type = "memory" property was mandatory in the early >> days as well, there shouldn't be any /memory nodes without this >> property. Given that, is the add-legacy-node-first still necessary? > > Agreed, I did that after speaking with someone on IRC which stated > (rightfully), that I should keep the legacy behavior if possible. My concern was about HW that passes a device tree to barebox (PowerPC possibly?), where it might have worked before and now won't anymore. If this is no real concern, it can be removed. Cheers Ahmad > However, I agree that since the device_type = "memory" property should > have always been there, there is no reason to keep this behavior. > > If you are ok with that, I will remove this chunk of code. > >> >> Sascha >> >> >> -- >> Pengutronix e.K. | | >> Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | >> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | >> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | > > _______________________________________________ > barebox mailing list > barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
