Hi Christian, Am Mittwoch, den 06.02.2019, 19:41 +0100 schrieb Christian Hemp: > The phyCORE-i.MX8M aka PCL-066 is a SoM containing a i.MX8M SoC. > > phyCORE-i.MX8M: > - 1GB LPDDR4 RAM > - eMMC > - microSD > - Ethernet > > Signed-off-by: Christian Hemp <christian.hemp@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/boards/Makefile | 1 + > arch/arm/boards/phytec-som-imx8m/.gitignore | 1 + > arch/arm/boards/phytec-som-imx8m/Makefile | 2 + > arch/arm/boards/phytec-som-imx8m/board.c | 55 + > arch/arm/boards/phytec-som-imx8m/ddr.h | 28 + > arch/arm/boards/phytec-som-imx8m/ddr_init.c | 225 +++++ > .../boards/phytec-som-imx8m/ddrphy_train.c | 947 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../flash-header-phycore-imx8mq.imxcfg | 5 + > arch/arm/boards/phytec-som-imx8m/lowlevel.c | 127 +++ > arch/arm/configs/imx_v8_defconfig | 2 + > arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 1 + > arch/arm/dts/imx8mq-phytec-phycore-som.dts | 328 ++++++ > arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 7 + > images/Makefile.imx | 5 + > 14 files changed, 1734 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/phytec-som-imx8m/.gitignore > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/phytec-som-imx8m/Makefile > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/phytec-som-imx8m/board.c > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/phytec-som-imx8m/ddr.h > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/phytec-som-imx8m/ddr_init.c > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/phytec-som-imx8m/ddrphy_train.c > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/phytec-som-imx8m/flash-header-phycore-imx8mq.imxcfg > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/phytec-som-imx8m/lowlevel.c > create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/imx8mq-phytec-phycore-som.dts The other supported i.MX8M boards are using a "imx8mq" name tag. I would really like to see some consistency here, as the i.MX8 naming in general is already confusing in itself, so we shouldn't add to this confusion by calling the same SoC both mx8m and mx8mq. Regards, Lucas _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
