Re: [PATCH 1/6] include: add SPDX GPL-2.0-only license tags where applicable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:59:02AM +0100, Roland Hieber wrote:
> I noticed that Linux usually removes the license headers and only keeps
> the copyright lines, but I wasn't able to find any reason for that. Do
> you have more insight here?

I tried to google around a bit, and found several discussions, which all
end in "SPDX is an industry-wide accepted standard" [1] and
"SPDX-License-Identifiers are a legally binding shorthand" [2], but
without further elaboration :-/

[1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10045625/#21135079
[2]: e.g. here https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/854656/ or
     in the commit message of [1] too

 - Roland

-- 
Roland Hieber                     | r.hieber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx     |
Pengutronix e.K.                  | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5086 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux