Hi Andrey. > > > > > > - return !bbu_find_handler(data->handler_name); > > > + return bbu_find_handler(data->handler_name); > > > > As bbu_find_handler() returns a pointer maybe better '!!' or > > bbu_find_handler() != NULL? > > > > That shouldn't be necessary At least to me the xxx != NULL would express the intent in a more clear way. But then if this becomes a common pattern then I will also learn that. But you got my preference. Sam _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
