On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:53:11PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I recently had a chance to work with at91sam9x5ek board and as a part >> of that effort I converted the code to support features found in >> Barebox for i.MX based SoCs. Most notably this patchset converts >> at91sam9x5ek to use multi-image PBL build process as well as adds >> support for board initialization from attached devicetree blob. >> >> Sascha, at least for now, all of the patches, in chronological order, >> are included in this submission. However if this proves to be too >> burdensome to review, I'd be more than happy to split it into several >> individual submissions. One such division could be: >> >> - Generic bug fixes/infrastructure enhancements >> - Peripheral drivers updates >> - at91sam9x5ek specific changes >> >> Please let me know if that is preferrable. > > I had a short look at all patches, overall they look good. Nevertheless > it would be good to sort them like you suggested. It just makes it > easier to apply. > OK, will do. > Thanks for working on this, a general AT91 overhaul was long overdue. I > hope this series prepares a path to cleanup the other AT91 SoCs aswell. > Yeah, I have a bit more AT91 based hardware (at least SAMA5D3 Xplained board and maybe more), so I was hoping to get those done after this merge request. > The clock support you ported over from the kernel is for all AT91 SoCs > and not only one, right? Yeah, I belive it should be usable by the whole AT91 family. Thanks, Andrey _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
