On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 07:54:23PM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote: >> Add provisions such that board code can re-define the behaviour of >> hang() to implement a behaviour better suited for a particular >> hardware platform. > > I'm generally fine with being able to overwrite hang(), but the ARM > specific changes here should be an extra patch with an explanation why > this change is necessary. I assume you want to make hang() usable > for early debugging in the PBL when the code is not running at the > address it's linked at. But that's only an assumption. > You are correct in your assumption. I'll split the patch in the next version of the series. > Sascha > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
