> No, we would like to clearly separate user docs But still it is unfortunate that two "Getting Barebox" chapters are there at all, and that they are very near to each. Also, I think that (necessarily!) the design desicions are now mostly in the user manual, e.g. device parameters. In the non-user-manual parts there is hardly contents at all. And most, e.g. the file system descriptions or the glossary, could very well be moved into the user manual. Which will lead us to ... the user-manual containing all of the current HTML docs. So, let me rephrase it: I also think that long term the whole current (!) HTML documentation should be part of the user manual. Simply because there's no developer documentation in the current (!) HTML, e.g. "How to start a new board" type docs, or an introduction into the file system structure. Maybe the PBL chapter is developer documentation, but that is (sic!) in the user manual ... _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
