Hi Robert, On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 09:50:03AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Tue, 13 May 2014, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As we all know the barebox documentation sucks. We @Pengutronix will > > have our internal techweek next month. One of the goals will be to > > improve the documentation situation for barebox. > > > > What are your opinions in which form the documentation should be? > > > > We currently have plain text files under Documentation/, a wiki on > > http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php and doxygen. None of the documentation > > sets is complete and all are outdated. > > as i want to introduce barebox into future embedded linux classes of > mine, i have a vested interest in making sure the documentation is > good. so while others argue about the proper format, i'll be happy to > put my editing talents to work and do a lot of proofreading. Thanks for the offer. I'll let you know when there's something to proofread. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
