On Tue, 13 May 2014, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi, > > As we all know the barebox documentation sucks. We @Pengutronix will > have our internal techweek next month. One of the goals will be to > improve the documentation situation for barebox. > > What are your opinions in which form the documentation should be? > > We currently have plain text files under Documentation/, a wiki on > http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php and doxygen. None of the documentation > sets is complete and all are outdated. as i want to introduce barebox into future embedded linux classes of mine, i have a vested interest in making sure the documentation is good. so while others argue about the proper format, i'll be happy to put my editing talents to work and do a lot of proofreading. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
