Hello Sascha; You are right; The problem is I did not use the defconfig, thus building relocatable binary. After using freescale_mx53_smd_defconfig, proper size value is stored in the image. Thank you for the help; Rostislav Lisovy On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 10:05 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi Rostislav, > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:30:29PM +0200, Rostislav Lisovy wrote: > > Dear barebox developers and users; > > I am compiling barebox for freescale-imx53-smd board. My issue is, > > that the image does not contain the correct size record. > > The "bootloader size" needed by the flashing tool is initialized in > > freescale-mx53-smd/flash_header.c, in structure flash_header, > > field .boot_data.size. > > Formerly there used to be a hardcoded value 0x40000, nowadays we use > > DCD_BAREBOX_SIZE which expands into (barebox_image_size + 4095), where > > "barebox_image_size" has real size computed by the linker. > > When the value .boot_data.size is filled by hand (as 0x40000), correct > > value is stored in the barebox image. > > Proof: hexdump -s 0x24 -n 4 barebox-flash-image > > 0000024 0000 0004 > > > > however if .boot_data.size = DCD_BAREBOX_SIZE, > > $ hexdump -s 0x24 -n 4 barebox-flash-image > > 0000024 0fff 0000 > > where this 0xfff is the "+4095" added to round the value. (I am pretty > > sure the offset into the image used by hexdump is correct). > > Probably you are not building the defconfig, right? Compiling the > defconfig gives me the correct value and it's at offset 0x424 in the > image, not at 0x24. > Maybe you are compiling a relocatable image as Jean-Christophe > mentioned, then you would see this problem. > > > > > The barebox version I am using most recent git, branch master. > > The compiler (maybe here is the point of failure) is > > arm-cortex_a8-linux-gnueabi-gcc (crosstool-NG hg+default-86a8d1d467c8) > > 4.4.6. > > That should be ok. > > Sascha > _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox