Hi, On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 02:21:00PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 02.07.2013, 14:24 +0200 schrieb Alexander Aring: > > Hi, > > > > i am not a make expert but this is a common error with newer make > > versions. > > > > But I think this solution isn't correct. It's better to split in two > > rules like: > > > > images/%.s: barebox.bin FORCE > > $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=images $@ > > > > images: barebox.bin FORCE > > $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=images $@ > > > > Getting this information from: > > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/error-mixed-implicit-and-normal-rules-while-trying-to-build-busybox-826795/ > > > > Regards > > Alex > > > > > This is already fixed. See message > 1372457390-20162-1-git-send-email-dev@xxxxxxxxxx > "[PATCH] Split Multimage Makefile rule in explicit and implicit parts" > ah good to know. Thanks and sry for the noise. :-) _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
