Re: [PATCH] Makefile: fix mixed implicit and normal rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 02:21:00PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 02.07.2013, 14:24 +0200 schrieb Alexander Aring:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > i am not a make expert but this is a common error with newer make
> > versions.
> > 
> > But I think this solution isn't correct. It's better to split in two
> > rules like:
> > 
> > images/%.s: barebox.bin FORCE
> >         $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=images $@
> > 
> > images: barebox.bin FORCE
> >         $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=images $@
> > 
> > Getting this information from:
> > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/error-mixed-implicit-and-normal-rules-while-trying-to-build-busybox-826795/
> > 
> > Regards
> > Alex
> > 
> > 
> This is already fixed. See message
> 1372457390-20162-1-git-send-email-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> "[PATCH] Split Multimage Makefile rule in explicit and implicit parts"
> 

ah good to know. Thanks and sry for the noise. :-)

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux