Am Dienstag, den 02.07.2013, 14:24 +0200 schrieb Alexander Aring: > Hi, > > i am not a make expert but this is a common error with newer make > versions. > > But I think this solution isn't correct. It's better to split in two > rules like: > > images/%.s: barebox.bin FORCE > $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=images $@ > > images: barebox.bin FORCE > $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=images $@ > > Getting this information from: > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/error-mixed-implicit-and-normal-rules-while-trying-to-build-busybox-826795/ > > Regards > Alex > > This is already fixed. See message 1372457390-20162-1-git-send-email-dev@xxxxxxxxxx "[PATCH] Split Multimage Makefile rule in explicit and implicit parts" Regards, Lucas -- Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5076 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
