On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Roberto Nibali wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:46:40PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > > > Hi Sascha, > > > > > > Le Thu, 24 May 2012 22:25:10 +0200, > > > Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:05:03PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > > > > > enabling SION bit makes SDHC1 working on the i.MX25. > > > > I am a bit surprised since in my case, SDHC1 worked out of the box, after > disabling all the iomux pad configuration settings. I believe sync'ing the > iomux with the kernel goes both with the philosophy of barebox and its > maintainability. > > > > > > Can we instead just sync the iomux file with the kernel? I think this > > > > > > OK will post the patch syncing barebox & kernel. > > > > > > > will make less problems in the longer run. At least as long the iomux > > > > files in the kernel still exist... > > > > > > > is iomux settings planned to be removed from the kernel ? > > > > I suppose when all i.MX are converted to devicetree and pinmux they will > > be removed. I don't know how long this will take though. > > > > > Has anybody started on the mx25 conversion to devicetree and pinmux yet? > Last time I checked at lot of other fsl cores had already been converted, > but not this one. Eric, have you tried moving to your mx25 to device tree > yet? I ported over the i.MX27 to devicetree (no pinmux though) and it turned out to be a fairly easy task, at least for the devices which are supported already due to the i.MX5/6 devicetree port. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
