On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:46:40PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> Le Thu, 24 May 2012 22:25:10 +0200,
> Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:05:03PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
> > > enabling SION bit makes SDHC1 working on the i.MX25.
I am a bit surprised since in my case, SDHC1 worked out of the box, after disabling all the iomux pad configuration settings. I believe sync'ing the iomux with the kernel goes both with the philosophy of barebox and its maintainability.
> > Can we instead just sync the iomux file with the kernel? I think thisI suppose when all i.MX are converted to devicetree and pinmux they will
>
> OK will post the patch syncing barebox & kernel.
>
> > will make less problems in the longer run. At least as long the iomux
> > files in the kernel still exist...
> >
> is iomux settings planned to be removed from the kernel ?
be removed. I don't know how long this will take though.
Has anybody started on the mx25 conversion to devicetree and pinmux yet? Last time I checked at lot of other fsl cores had already been converted, but not this one. Eric, have you tried moving to your mx25 to device tree yet?
Cheers
Roberto
_______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
