On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:39:10AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> thoughts on the following patch? it's certainly not the final
> result, but it at least *starts* the process of properly recognizing
> newer pandaboards, using code taking very close to verbatim out of
> u-boot.
>
> it's been compile-tested and appears to still work on all boards it
> did before. i'll do a bit more testing to make sure of that, but is
> there any philosophical objection to the following as a single patch
> submission?
Nope, looks good, except for the whitespace damage between here
> + case MIDR_CORTEX_A9_R2P10:
> + switch (readl(CONTROL_ID_CODE)) {
> + case OMAP4460_CONTROL_ID_CODE_ES1_1:
> + return OMAP4460_ES1_1;
> + break;
> + case OMAP4460_CONTROL_ID_CODE_ES1_0:
> + default:
> + return OMAP4460_ES1_0;
> + break;
> + }
> + break;
> + default:
> + return OMAP4430_SILICON_ID_INVALID;
> + break;
> }
and here.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
