On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Hi,
> Le Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:20:45 -0500 (EST),
> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > just for fun, i configured and built MLO and barebox.bin for the
> > panda, then tried to use that on a panda ES -- got no response
> > whatever from minicom. i did verify that i could boot to barebox just
> > fine on a regular panda, though.
> >
> > this is different from the case of a regular beagle and beagle xM,
> > for which the MLO and barebox.bin boot just fine on an xM, so there's
> > clearly a significant difference between those two panda variants as
> > far as barebox is concerned. i haven't had any time to look at it in
> > more detail yet.
> >
> Panda ES has a OMAP4460 @ 1.2GHz Panda has a OMAP4430 @ 1GHz.
> This patch series shows that some changes are really needed to switch
> from the 4430 to the 4460 :
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-July/096351.html
yup, i'm already looking at that. hoping i'm not out of my depth
here, but i like a challenge. :-)
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
