On 10:37 Tue 03 Jan , Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 04:21:27PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/boards/at91sam9260ek/init.c | 1 + > > arch/arm/boards/at91sam9261ek/init.c | 1 + > > arch/arm/boards/at91sam9263ek/init.c | 1 + > > arch/arm/boards/at91sam9m10g45ek/init.c | 1 + > > arch/arm/boards/usb-a926x/init.c | 1 + > > 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9260ek/init.c b/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9260ek/init.c > > index dbd6541..b10d0dc 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9260ek/init.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9260ek/init.c > > @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ static struct atmel_nand_data nand_pdata = { > > #else > > .bus_width_16 = 0, > > #endif > > + .on_flash_bbt = 1, > > This field does not exist and is not added in this series, so current > next is broken on Atmel. > Maybe your branch is different from your pull request? I had to apply > these patches from the mails since I can't reach your server. I resend the patch to the ML Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox