On 09:06 Fri 09 Dec , Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 03:24:33PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > On 10:17 Thu 08 Dec , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/imx27.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/include/mach/imx27-regs.h | 1 + > > > 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > do we really need this in barebox? > > Why not? It's basically just a handfull of register accesses which are > normally hidden in lowlevel_init without anybody noticing it. The fact > that I created defines for them just makes it slightly more visible. can we have a small comment when they are needed at list Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
