On 18:53 Fri 10 Dec , Marc Reilly wrote: > Hi, > > > PLwase specify against which kernel > It's directly from http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/ > > To be honest, I didn't even think about needing to match up against a specific > version of the kernel, but I guess it does deserve consideration. > From my understanding, the machine numbers are reserved forever and there is a > 1:1 correspondence between the mach number and the device itself. It's only > the label that may change. So this patch would be bad if someone has changed > their machine name, but hasn't changed their code within barebox. not really sometimes they change so to trac it it's better to have a reference > > I'll leave my thinking there because it's late friday arvo, and smarter minds > have probably thought this one out before. :) > > Otherwise, would it be better if I just submitted a "one liner" patch which > just adds my new machine? no we update the whole file we need to be sync with the kernel Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
