On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 07:51:27PM +0100, Alessandro Rubini wrote: > > Should we hide the different handling by providing an x86 specific > > version of the "bootm" command or should we add a new command that > > deals with bzImage's special requirements? > > I'd use "mkimage" on the bzImage file to make an uImage, with name > string, checksum and the rest of meta information (is load address > applicable to the crappy 16-bit processor of the eighties?) I'm not really a friend of the uImage format, I think shouldn't introduce it on even more architectures. > > /alessandro, who just learnt new grubs wait untile the vga cable is plugged Cool :) Nearly as good as "keyboard error. Press F1 to continue" Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ u-boot-v2 mailing list u-boot-v2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/u-boot-v2
